How Preparation H Suppositories Work

The Sea That Thinks

This film is the biggest saw mind when I came across a very long time now. This is not necessarily a bad thing.

There is no real plot. The film shows the writer of the film while writing the script of the film itself . Ok, I grant you 5 minutes for reflection.
...

tic ...

tac ...
Done? Well.
Your conclusion probably will have been "How the hell can such a thing?"
In practice, you see a guy (Bart) is writing to the computer. What is writing? Stuff like "Bart goes through the tea", and a moment later, while sipping a cup of this drink, that's the risk of choking. Recursion
cinemtografica:-D
It's not that I was talking nonsense about mental masturbations.

The film is a succession of Escher optical illusions, sudden changes point of view, both optical and narrative. You see a scene, and shortly after he discovers that in fact the scene was in a TV screen, which in turn is part of a picture, and so forth until the audience is completely confused.

For the viewer, the film is a continuous trudge to search for points of reference on which to build an understanding of the plot. Impossible task, given that the purpose of the film is just to systematically destroy these benchmarks.

And to make matters worse, throughout the film there is a voiceover (which actually comes from a recorder that protaginista are using) to philosophize about what is real and what is not, on the thought and ' I .

conclude by telling a scene. In the movie there is a female character, Marga (which actually feels Solola vocals). In a sequence is a closeup of a post-it on which is written " The viewer thinks: Marga = Lois." My initial reaction was "a moment, I never thought anything like that." Moment of reflection. Then: "You bastard, 'he cheated."

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0261277/